[Content warning – reproductive rights, abortion]Continue reading “The Trials to Come – An Initial Analysis of SB 8’s Impact on Libraries and Patrons”
A lot happened in the privacy world last week! Let’s go over a couple of news items that affect libraries and library patrons alike.
LastPass Free Tier Woes
The popular password manager LastPass announced changes to their free tier accounts last week that could leave many libraries and library patrons scrambling for an alternative. Starting March 16th, LastPass will require free account users to choose where to use LastPass: mobile or computer. Free account users will also lose access to email support to troubleshoot any problems with the password manager. For many free tier account users, being forced to choose to have their primary password manager only installed on one platform severely limits the usefulness and protection of their chosen password manager.
If you have a LastPass free tier account and don’t want these restrictions, your options are limited:
- If you have room in your budget and want to stay with LastPass, you can upgrade to a paid account. This option not only avoids migrating your passwords to another manager and instead unlocks additional features, such as encrypted file storage. While we’re used to having “free” accounts, it might be time to make peace with the fact that it’s time to start paying for password managers.
- You can migrate to another password manager. There are several choices in the marketplace; however, not many have free tier accounts, which means you might end up paying for a password manager anyway. Bitwarden, an open-source password manager, does have a free tier account that allows for syncing between multiple devices if you need a free account. KeePassXP is another free option for the more technically-inclined who can self-host their password manager.
You can read more about the basics of password managers in our Obligatory Password Manager post from April 2020.
Clubhouse Is Not Your Library’s New Social Media App
So… Clubhouse, that new shiny app that everyone’s talking about. You’re curious about it, aren’t you? You’re wondering if you can add it to the family of social media accounts for your library when you get an invite to join.
Let us stop you right there.
- Clubhouse: Privacy concerns raised over how app uses people’s data when they sign up
- When FOMO Trumps Privacy: The Clubhouse Edition
- You’ve been invited to Clubhouse. Your privacy hasn’t.
- Clubhouse Is Suggesting Users Invite Their Drug Dealers and Therapists (and related Twitter thread)
Virginia Getting a New Data Privacy Law?
Virginia libraries! You might have heard about a new data privacy bill that currently sits on the governor’s desk at the time of this writing (it might be signed by the time this post is published!). What is the library tl;dr of the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act?
- The bill provides similar data rights as California’s two new privacy regulations, CCPA and CPRA, including rights for consumers to request access and deletion of personal data, as well as the right to opt-out of businesses selling their data.
- The bill’s scope is also similar to CCPA’s and CPRA’s scopes, targeting for-profit businesses doing business in the state who meet certain thresholds, such as controlling or processing data from 100,000 consumers. Non-profits and higher education institutions are exempt.
Once this bill is signed into law, library vendors who do business in the state and meet the scope thresholds will need to comply with the new law. Library vendors who already comply with CCPA have a head start, but libraries might find themselves with vendors who have to play catchup. It might be time to start reviewing contracts and vendor privacy policies as well as the Act to determine what data rights your patrons have and how they can exercise those rights with those vendors.
LDH in The News
LDH is proud to announce that our founder, Becky Yoose, will give the Keynote Address at the Evergreen International Online Conference on May 25th, 2021! This annual conference draws Evergreen users, developers, advocates, vendors, and others interested in the Evergreen ILS or open-source software community from around the library world and beyond. This year’s conference is online and registration is now open! If you want to join in on the presentation fun, the call for proposals is open until March. We look forward to seeing you at the conference!
Welcome to this week’s Tip of the Hat!
Today we’re happy to announce the publication of the Data Privacy Best Practices Toolkit for Libraries. This toolkit is part of the Data Privacy Best Practices Training for Libraries project, an LSTA-funded collaborative project between the Pacific Library Partnership and LDH focusing on teaching libraries the basics of data privacy. This introduction into data privacy in libraries serves as a guide for both administration and front-line workers, providing practical advice and knowledge in protecting patron data privacy.
What does the toolkit cover? The topics range from the data lifecycle and managing vendor relationships to creating policies and procedures to protect patron privacy. The toolkit covers specific privacy concerns in the library, including law enforcement requests, surveillance, and data analytics. We also get to meet Mel and Rafaël, two library patrons who have unique privacy issues that libraries need to consider when thinking about patron privacy. At the end of the toolkit is an extensive resource section with library privacy scholarship, professional standards, and regulations for further reading.
This toolkit is part of a larger group of resources, including templates and examples libraries can use to develop contract addendums, privacy policies and procedures, and data inventories and privacy risk assessments. In short, there are a lot of resources that are freely available for you to use in your library! Please let us know if you have any questions about the project resources.
Finally, stay tuned – the project is going into its second year, focusing on “train the trainer” workshops for both data privacy and cybersecurity. We’ll keep you updated as more materials are published!
Welcome to this week’s Tip of the Hat!
The Executive Assistant has her paws full this week with rescheduling and shifting various project timelines around thanks to recent events. She was
batting objects off of ledges redoing Gantt charts when she came across a small list of privacy-related things to do on a rainy day and promptly knocked the list off the pile and onto the floor. While this is not a rainy day, a few of us could use a distraction, so what can be a better distraction than protecting your privacy?
Today we’ll explore doxing: what it is, how it can harm you and your patrons, and what you can do to protect yourself and patrons from being doxed.
Doxing and You
Doxing is the act of publishing private or otherwise identifying information about a person to the public. This can include your home address, phone number, private email address, or bank account details, but it can also involve publishing private information about those close to you, like family members, along with your private information. Most times doxing is used as a tactic to intimidate or to harm a person or their loved ones – an infamous example of doxing in action is Gamergate, where online harassers doxed several games journalists, researchers, and others in the gaming industry.
Being doxed can mean a stranger showing up at your home or otherwise harassing you as you try to go about your daily life, but it can also mean that your identity can be stolen. With just a few pieces of private personal information, you can social engineer your way through customer service staff and help desk representatives to get access to critical accounts, potentially destroying the financial and reputational aspects of a person’s life in the process.
How to Dox Yourself (@ the Library)
The scary part about doxing is that anyone with little time and effort you can get access to private information. The New York Times recently published a guide on how to dox yourself, describing the various places where you can find information that you thought was not available to the public. Search engines, social media, and data brokers are all potential sources for doxers looking for your private information. Take some time to study their resource guide and perform some searches on your favorite search engine. You might be (un)pleasantly surprised as to what you can find about yourself.
Libraries are not exempt from being potential targets for doxers to gain information about a person. Library patrons routinely contact library staff with requests or questions about their patron account or another person’s patron account. What can be in the patron record that can potentially be used to dox someone? Legal name, home address, and birth date are three pieces of patron data that come to mind. Chances are, though, that your patron record includes much more, including telephone numbers, email addresses, and even government or organization-issued identification numbers, such as driver’s license numbers or student or employee id numbers.
Library workers also face the possibility of being doxed and harassed. An article by American Libraries recounted the experiences of two library school professors who were doxed for their research on racial microaggressions in academic libraries. Library workers are subject to the same harassment and doxing that their patrons face in daily life, as documented in the article. Any private information of both patrons and library workers is fair game to a doxer, even at the library.
How can you protect yourself and others from doxing?
On the personal front:
- Remove any personal information from the internet that you want to keep private. There are several good guides you can use to help you through this process:
- Be judicious to what you post online through social media and other digital spaces
On the library front, review policies and procedures surrounding patron data confidentiality, particularly surrounding requests to disclose patron information:
- Do you have a procedure in place to verify the patron’s identity if they request access to information in their patron record? What are the procedures regarding identity verification in-person versus over the phone versus online?
- What information is used in the verification process?
- What information do you disclose in the patron record in person? Over the phone? Online?
- What is the procedure when the patron doesn’t have this information for verification?
- What is the procedure if the patron requests access to another patron’s record?
Employee information also needs protection; however, a different set of regulations, policies, and procedures apply. Check with your human resources staff as well as legal counsel to determine what information is private, what is public, and when employers are allowed to disclose employee information to others.
Doxing is scary and can lead to harassment and other dangerous situations. The best personal defense against doxing is to be proactive in limiting the amount of private information a random person off the street can access through a data broker, your online presence, or other places where private information can be accessed by someone with a little bit of time and resources. The best library defense is making sure that there are policies and procedures in place for verification of the patron’s identity before disclosing patron information in certain situations, as well as protecting the privacy of library worker information, be it from not publishing private information such as home addresses to protecting the data from unauthorized access.
Welcome to this week’s Tip of the Hat!
Remember when the online library catalog was just a telnet client? For some of you, you might even remember the process of moving from the card catalog to an online catalog. The library catalog has seen many different forms in recent decades.
The most recent wave of transitions is the migration from an old web catalog – in most cases an OPAC that came standard with an ILS – to a newer discovery layer. This discovery layer is typically hosted by the vendor and offers the ability to search for a wider array of collections and materials. Another main draw of the discovery layers in the market is the enhanced user experience. Many discovery layers allow users to add content to the site, including ratings, comments, and sharing their reading lists to others on the site.
While being able to provide newer services to patrons is important, this also brings up a dilemma for libraries. Many discovery layers are hosted by vendors, and many have separate Terms of Service and Privacy Policies attached to their products outside of the library’s policies. The majority of library catalogs that the discovery layers are meant to replace are locally hosted by the library, and fall under the library’s privacy policies. Libraries who made the transition to the discovery layer more often than not left their older catalog up and running, marketed as the “classic” catalog. However, the work necessary to keep up two catalogs can be substantial, and some libraries have retired their classic catalogs, leaving only the discovery layer for patrons to use.
We can use the Library Bill of Rights [LBR] interpretations from ALA to help guide us through this dilemma. The digital access interpretations of the LBR provides some guidance:
Users have the right to be free of unreasonable limitations or conditions set by libraries, librarians, system administrators, vendors, network service providers, or others. Contracts, agreements, and licenses entered into by libraries on behalf of their users should not violate this right… As libraries increasingly provide access to digital resources through third-party vendors, libraries have a responsibility to hold vendors accountable for protecting patrons’ privacy. [Access to Digital Resources and Services: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights]
The classic catalog/discovery layer dilemma is a good example of how offering newer third-party platforms to provide core library services can create privacy dilemmas for your patrons and potentially lock them out from using core services. If your library finds itself making such a transition – be it the library catalog or another core service platform – the ALA Privacy Checklists and the interpretations of the LBR can help guide libraries through the planning process. Regardless of the actions taken by the library, ensuring that all patrons have access to core library services should be a priority, and that includes taking privacy concerns to account when replacing core service platforms.
[Which, ICYMI, LDH will be exhibiting at Annual! Let us know if you want to meet up and talk about all things privacy and libraries!]
As we encountered last week, privacy policies are not the most exciting documents to read. In fact, you can test out this theory by checking out the impressive list of electronic resource vendor privacy policies generated by the folks at York University (the code is available on GitHub). Try picking out a couple of privacy policies and read them from start to finish now. We’ll be here waiting for you.
……. all done?
Chances are, you probably found yourself skimming the policies if you made it all the way to the bottom. If so, you’re not alone – studies have shown that the majority of folks do not read these policies, which could lead to surprises and confusion when your data is collected, shared, or breached. The fact is that it takes a long time to get through long, detailed documents – a recent study showed that many privacy policies require a high reading level and up to around a half hour to read. What’s a busy person to do?
For Polisis’ analysis of OverDrive’s policy, the site takes the same ten categories and creates separate visualizations for most of them. Users can click on a stream to highlight it in the diagram – for example, showing what information is shared and for what reason.
We are still a ways away before widespread adoption of AI-annotated privacy policies; however, the possibilities are promising. With GDPR, CCPA, and other upcoming privacy regulations, AI and ML could help end users in keeping up with all the changes in policies, as well as dig through mountains of text in a fraction of the time it would have taken to manually read all of the text. It will still take a considerable human role in training the AI and supervising the ML to ensure proper analysis, though, as well as human labor in creating effective and accessible interfaces. Perhaps one day there could be an API service that can have AI analyze the privacy policies listed on the York University page.
Welcome to this week’s Tip of the Hat! It seems that spring has just arrived for many of us in the US; however, the calendar tells us that we are only weeks away from the ALA Annual Conference in Washington DC in June. Our Executive Assistant was going through the PDF registration form the other day and noticed the following question:
The above question on the registration form asks if the person (or in this case, cat) wants to receive information from conference exhibitors. The Executive Assistant paused. What does checking the “Yes” box all entail? Since we’re in the data privacy business, this is a perfect Monday Mystery for us to investigate.
The “Information Collection & Use” section lays out what information is collected and when. They define “personal data” as information that can be used to identify someone: name, email, address, etc. The section breaks down some common actions and situations when ALA collects data, including event registration. We already guessed that ALA was collecting our information for event registration purposes, but we need to dig deeper into the policy to answer our question.
We then find a section labeled “Information Sharing” in which we might find our answer! The section lists who ALA shares information with in detail, including the type of data and circumstances that the data is shared. “Services Providers” seems promising – that is until we get into the details. The data listed that is shared to service providers is mostly technical data – location data, log files, and cookies – and has nothing regarding giving information to receive updates from exhibitors. Back to square one.
Moving down the policy, we arrive at the “Your Rights and Choices Regarding Your Information” section, which lists the following right:
“Object to processing – You have the right to object to your Personal Data used in the following manners: (a) processing based on legitimate interests or the performance of a task in the public interest/exercise of official authority (including profiling); (b) direct marketing (including profiling); and (c) processing for purposes of scientific/historical research and statistics;”
Okay, we have the right to ask ALA not to use our personal data for marketing purposes. That’s a very important right to have, though that doesn’t exactly solve the mystery of what happens when we click on the “Yes” box.
This, readers, is where we are going to cheat in this investigation. It’s time to put our exhibitor hat on!
Exhibitors at major conferences are usually offered some form of registrant/member list as a means to promote their business before the conference. ALA does the same with Annual, and exhibitors can rent attendee lists. From https://2019.alaannual.org/list-rental, exhibitors have the option to “[t]arget buyers by industry segment, demographic profile or geographic area.” So, just not names and emails are shared!
On the exhibitor side, having that information would allow for targeted marketing – instead of blasting the entire attendee list, exhibitors can reach out to those most likely to be receptive to their service or product. On the attendee side, some want to have this type of targeted marketing to plan their time at the conference efficiently, or to do homework before hitting the exhibit hall. For other attendees, though, it means more emails that they’ll just delete or unsubscribe. And then there’s the question about what happens to that attendee data after the conference…
In the end, we still have a bit of a mystery on our hands. The only reason we got this far in our little Monday Mystery investigation is that LDH has been bombarded with emails trying to sell us attendee lists which tipped us off to start looking at the exhibitor section of the conference site. Your average conference attendee wouldn’t have that information and would be left scratching their heads due to the lack of information at the point of registration about what information is shared on these attendee lists. While we don’t have a clear answer to end today’s investigation, we hope that this gives our readers a little reminder to do some research the next time they are asked a similar question on a registration form.
Speaking of ALA Annual, LDH Consulting Services is excited to announce that we will be exhibiting in DC in booth 844! Many thanks to Equinox Open Library Initiative for making exhibiting at ALA Annual possible for LDH. Give us a ping if you will be at Annual and would like to talk more about LDH can do for your organization.